McKinney Chiropractor Best Practices Research Commentary by Dr. Travis Downs

McKinney Chiropractor Best Practices

Research Commentary;

Does Maintained Spinal Manipulation Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Result in Better Long-Term Outcome?

Mohammed K. Senna, MD, and Shereen A. Machaly, MD

Research reviewed by Dr. Travis Downs

Summarized Review Conclusions

This study helps us to learn a few things about the treatment of lower back pain. The chiropractic adjustment is not only effective with low back pain in the chronic phase of pain but also shown to be long-term benefit towards wellness.  This research clearly outlined that when a chronic patient gets out of the acute phase of pain they should begin a phase of maintenance to solidify their healing, this choice of maintenance will help them to achieve wellness. In the presence of chronic pain and inflammation the lifestyle habits you developed to create the problem are the habits you must change to eradicate the problem. The first item each patient wants to address is pain, the next items they need to address are their negative habits from eating, moving and daily stress. Human health is maintained or destroyed over a period of time with a repetition of choices; good and bad. Our ability to help a patient resolve these issues is often further than the pain treatment alone. The continuation of their maintenance care program along with better lifestyle choices is what will sustain the healing process and allow them to maintain a pain free life. The strongest conclusion of this research began in the last 10 months of the research where the group receiving adjustments once every 2 weeks, for the 10 months continued to show improvement and move towards wellness.  The group that did not receive adjustments and the group receiving fake adjustments returned to their pre-acute levels of pain and dysfunction.  This shows the need for patients moving towards sustained wellness must include a maintenance period of 10 months.

“Nonspecific LBP represents about 85% of LBP patients seen in primary care.4 About 10% will go on to develop chronic, disabling LBP.5 It is this group of LBP that uses the majority of health care and socioeconomic costs.6,7 “

  1. Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman AML. Beyond the good prognosis: examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1:115–20.
  2. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000;84:95–103.
  3. Kent PM, Keating JL. The epidemiology of low back pain in primary care. Chirop Osteop 2005;13:13.

“Despite the three groups of patients were similar at baseline evaluation (Tables 1 and 2), patients in the second and third groups experienced significantly lower pain and disability scores compared with the control group after the first phase of treatments, that is, after 1-month period. By the end of second phase of treatment (after 10-month period), patients with maintained SMT had significantly lower pain and disability scores compared with the patients of the non-maintained SMT group. “

Mohammed K. Senna, MD, and Shereen A. Machaly, MD

“By the end of the study, pain score yielded a reduction of 19.26 mm in the maintained SMT group whereas it is returned near to the pretreatment level in the group of patients who discontinued their therapy interventions (Table 6 and Figure 2). “

Mohammed K. Senna, MD, and Shereen A. Machaly, MD

“SMT is effective for the treatment of chronic nonspecific LBP. To obtain long-term benefit, this study suggests maintenance SM after the initial intensive manipulative. “

Mohammed K. Senna, MD, and Shereen A. Machaly, MD

Introduction to the Research

When we look at research for chiropractic care and low back pain, most of it will only deal with the acute or initial treatment to see when the spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) will relieve the pain in the patient. This Randomized Controlled Trial research takes it a step further and looks at the participants with chronic low back pain that have been experiencing the pain for longer than 6 months.  The study continues to examine these patients after they have resolved the acute pain to evaluate the benefits of a maintenance (stabilization) period of care against participants without any maintenance (stabilization) care.  The fact is LBP will effect 80% of the adult population at some point in their life.   For this reason, this RCT research provides us with information that will be of the highest benefit for the patient and practitioner.

Research Methodology

Sixty patients, with chronic, nonspecific LBP lasting at least 6 months, were randomized to receive either (1) 12 treatments of sham SMT over a 1-month period, (2) 12 treatments, consisting of SMT over a 1-month period, but no treatments for the subsequent 9 months, or (3) 12 treatments over a 1-month period, along with “maintenance spinal manipulation” every 2 weeks for the following 9 months. To determine any difference among therapies, we measured pain and disability scores, generic health status, and back-specific patient satisfaction at baseline and at 1-, 4-, 7-, and 10-month intervals.

Research Findings

  • SMT is effective for the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. To obtain long-term benefit, this study suggests maintenance adjustments after the initial intensive manipulative therapy.
  • Application of SMT yielded better results when com- pared with the sham manipulation.
  • We suggest that maintained SMTis beneficial to patients of chronic nonspecific LBP particularly those who gain improvement after initial intensive manipulation to maintain the improved posttreatment pain and disability levels

Research References

As always with these reviews, these are my takeaways from the article, and I encourage you to read the article in its entirety.  The references used in this article by the authors of this article are listed below.

References

  1. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults. Health provider utilization and care seeking. J Manip Physiol Ther 2004;27:327–35.
  2. Waddell G. The clinical course of low back pain In: Waddell G, ed. The Back Pain Revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK; 1998.
  3. Bogduk N, McGuirk B. Medical Management of Acute and Chron- ic Low Back Pain: An Evidence-based Approach. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier, 2002.
  4. Deyo RA, Phillips WR. Low back pain: a primary care challenge. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2826–32.
  5. Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman AML. Beyond the good prognosis: examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1:115–20.
  6. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000;84:95–103.
  7. Kent PM, Keating JL. The epidemiology of low back pain in primary care. Chirop Osteop 2005;13:13.
  8. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2504–13.
  9. Di Fabio RP. Efficacy of manual therapy. Phys Ther 1992;72: 853–64.
  10. Anderson R, Meeker WC, Wirick BE, et al. A meta-analysis of clinical trials of spinal manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992;15:181–94.
  11. Shekelle PG, Adams AH, Chassin MR, et al. Spinal manipulation for low-back pain. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:590–8.
  12. Lee KP, Carlini WG, McCormick GF, et al. Neurologic complica- tions following chiropractic manipulation: a survey of California neurologists. Neurology 1995;45:1213–15.
  13. Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Knipschild PG, et al. The relationship be- tween methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation. JAMA 1995;274:1942–8.
  14. Assendelft WJ, Morton SC, Yu EI, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:871–81.
  15. Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American pain society/American college of physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:492–504.
  16. Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2835–43.
  17. Ernst E. Does spinal manipulation have specific treatment effects? Fam Pract 2000;17:554–6.
  18. Assendelft WJ, Morton SC, Yu EI, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for low-back pain (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004.
  19. Stig LC, Nilsson O, Leboeuf-Yde C. Recovery pattern of patients treated with chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for long- lasting or recurrent low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:288–91.
  20. Fritz JM, Brennan GP, Leaman H. Does the evidence for spinal manipulation translate into better outcomes in routine clinical care for patients with occupational low back pain? Spine J 2006;6:289–95.
  21. Descarreaux M, Blouin J, Drolet M, et al. Efficacy of preventive spinal manipulation for chronic low back pain and related disabilities: a preliminary study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27:509–14.
  22. Harvey E, Burton AK, Klaber Moffett J, et al. Spinal manipulation for low back pain: a treatment package agreed by the UK chiro practice, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associations. Manual Ther 2003;8:46–51.
  23. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Childs JD, et al. Comparison of the effective- ness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;10:7–11.
  24. Licciardone JC, Stoll ST, Fulda KG, et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28(13):1355–62.
  25. Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, et al. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2032S–6S.
  26. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000;25:2940–52.
  27. Olaogun MOB, Adedoyin RA, Ikem IC, et al. Reliability of rating low back pain with a visual analogue scale and a semantic differential scale. Physiother Theory Pract 2004;20:135–42.
  28. Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:903–12.
  29. Macrae IF, Wright V. Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis 1969;28:584–9.
  30. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2128–56.
  31. Fritz J, Whitman J, Flynn T, et al. Factors related to the inability of individuals with low back pain to improve with a spinal manipulation. Physiol Therap 2004;84:173–90.
  32. Coxhead CE, Inskip H, Meade TW, et al. Multicentre trial of physiotherapy in the management of sciatic symptoms. Lancet 1981;1:1065–8.
  33. Nachemson A, Jonsson E, Englund L, et al. Neck and Back Pain: The Scientific Evidence of Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment. In: Nachemson AL, Jonsson E, eds. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1–12.
  34. Waagen GN, Haldeman S, Cook G, et al. Short term trial of chiro- practic adjustments for the relief of chronic low back pain. Manual Med 1986;2:63–7.
  35. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, et al. The effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy, and treatment by the general practitioner for nonspecific back and neck complaints. A randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:28–35.
  36. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Mameren H, et al. Randomized clini- cal trial of manipulative therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints: results of one year follow-up. BMJ 1992;304:601–5.
  37. Childs JD, Flynn TW, Fritz JM. A perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain. Manual Ther 2006;11(4):316–20.
  38. Hemmila HM, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Levoska S, et al. Long- term effectiveness of bone-setting, light exercise therapy, and physiotherapy for prolonged back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:99–104.
  39. UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomized trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 2004;329:1377.
  40. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Hondras MA, et al. Manipulative therapy versus education programs in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:948–55.
  41. Boutron I, Guittet L, Estellat C, et al. Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med 2007;4:e61.
  42. Wood L. The association of allocation and blinding with estimated treatment effect varies according to type of outcome: a combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. 14th Cochrane Colloquium: Bridging the Gaps 2006 23–26 October; Dublin, Ireland.
  43. Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3100–3.
  44. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain dis- ability scale. Phys Ther 2001;81:776–88.
  45. Aure OF, Nilsen JH, Vasseljen O. Manual therapy and exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:525–31.
  46. Meeker WC, Haldeman S. Chiropractic: a profession at the cross- roads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med 2002;136–3.
  47. Pedlow S, Luke JV, Blumberg SJ. Multiple imputation of missing household poverty level values from the national survey of children with special health care needs, 2001, and the National Survey of Children’s Health. 2003,22. 2007. Available at: http://www.cdc. gov/nchs/data/slaits/mimp01_03.pdf. Accessed July 2011.
  48. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.